Detailed_Origin_Or_Asian

Top counties by representation: Laotian

Counties and equivalents where the allocated community estimate is the greatest share of the local population.

How to read this list: These are population-weighted ZIP allocation estimates; decimal values are expected. Rankings are among counties and county equivalents published for this community.
Top 100
Standard competition ranking; ties share a rank.
Download community CSV
RankPlaceEstimated communityLocal representationEligible universe
#1Buena Vista County, 19 834.54.1155% #1 of 1,020
#2Hamilton County, 19 261.81.6174% #2 of 1,020
#3Sebastian County, 05 1,923.71.4977% #3 of 1,020
#4Dakota County, 31 3011.4065% #4 of 1,020
#5Cottonwood County, 27 140.91.3552% #5 of 1,020
#6Rutherford County, 47 4,499.71.2414% #6 of 1,020
#7Iberia County, 22 814.01.1993% #7 of 1,020
#8Roseau County, 27 1721.1342% #8 of 1,020
#9Nobles County, 27 203.00.9716% #9 of 1,020
#10Potter County, 48 1,032.70.8499% #10 of 1,020
#11Johnson County, 31 430.8170% #11 of 1,020
#12Habersham County, 13 316.90.7872% #12 of 1,020
#13Cowley County, 20 2710.7800% #13 of 1,020
#14Seward County, 20 149.90.7209% #14 of 1,020
#15Floyd County, 19 96.50.6474% #15 of 1,020
#16Lincoln County, 27 43.00.5715% #16 of 1,020
#17Hancock County, 39 4350.5480% #17 of 1,020
#18Pacific County, 53 1360.5391% #18 of 1,020
#19Jackson County, 27 74.00.5390% #19 of 1,020
#20Greater Bridgeport Planning Region, 09 1,7580.5338% #20 of 1,020
#21Wapello County, 19 184.80.5292% #21 of 1,020
#22Scott County, 27 879.60.5290% #22 of 1,020
#23Polk County, 19 2,611.80.5280% #23 of 1,020
#24Fresno County, 06 5,233.00.5244% #24 of 1,020
#25Winnebago County, 17 1,391.90.5095% #25 of 1,020
#26McCurtain County, 40 1480.4973% #26 of 1,020
#27Cass County, 18 178.70.4843% #27 of 1,020
#28Ottawa County, 26 1,411.30.4822% #28 of 1,020
#29Providence County, 44 3,1030.4668% #29 of 1,020
#30Washington County, 05 1,142.50.4589% #30 of 1,020
#31Sedgwick County, 20 2,333.90.4465% #31 of 1,020
#32Hall County, 31 230.60.4461% #32 of 1,020
#33Crawford County, 05 2670.4437% #33 of 1,020
#34Lauderdale County, 47 98.20.4345% #34 of 1,020
#35Woodbury County, 19 418.80.4176% #35 of 1,020
#36Tehama County, 06 329.20.3907% #36 of 1,020
#37Crawford County, 13 87.30.3599% #37 of 1,020
#38Edmunds County, 46 12.90.3578% #38 of 1,020
#39Clayton County, 13 930.10.3517% #39 of 1,020
#40San Joaquin County, 06 2,705.60.3476% #40 of 1,020
#41Anchorage County, 02 946.30.3402% #41 of 1,020
#42Banks County, 13 90.70.3375% #42 of 1,020
#43Siskiyou County, 06 1380.3223% #43 of 1,020
#44Haskell County, 40 37.70.3195% #44 of 1,020
#45Sacramento County, 06 5,063.90.3194% #45 of 1,020
#46Broome County, 36 581.60.3090% #46 of 1,020
#47Donley County, 48 8.40.3075% #47 of 1,020
#48Kane County, 17 1,557.10.3037% #48 of 1,020
#49Yuba County, 06 255.60.3001% #49 of 1,020
#50Spartanburg County, 45 966.90.2850% #50 of 1,020
#51Clarke County, 19 280.2809% #51 of 1,020
#52Guilford County, 37 1,499.80.2800% #52 of 1,020
#53Adams County, 55 69.90.2654% #53 of 1,020
#54Lyon County, 19 170.2648% #54 of 1,020
#55Benton County, 05 796.90.2641% #55 of 1,020
#56Yell County, 05 50.40.2615% #56 of 1,020
#57Tarrant County, 48 5,400.00.2581% #57 of 1,020
#58St. Mary County, 22 103.20.2572% #58 of 1,020
#59Franklin County, 53 258.20.2572% #59 of 1,020
#60Dawes County, 31 16.60.2486% #60 of 1,020
#61St. Martin County, 22 155.40.2435% #61 of 1,020
#62Kiowa County, 40 190.2434% #62 of 1,020
#63Douglas County, 20 2480.2411% #63 of 1,020
#64Shasta County, 06 4290.2404% #64 of 1,020
#65Glenn County, 06 650.2368% #65 of 1,020
#66Isle of Wight County, 51 950.2355% #66 of 1,020
#67Dallas County, 19 251.50.2310% #67 of 1,020
#68Cleveland County, 37 229.50.2303% #68 of 1,020
#69Hennepin County, 27 2,914.60.2289% #69 of 1,020
#70Foard County, 48 2.00.2226% #70 of 1,020
#71Cumberland County, 42 571.70.2222% #71 of 1,020
#72Pinellas County, 12 2,0930.2172% #72 of 1,020
#73Mahaska County, 19 58.40.2164% #73 of 1,020
#74Champaign County, 17 4280.2058% #74 of 1,020
#75Scott County, 05 300.2046% #75 of 1,020
#76San Diego County, 06 6,800.00.2046% #76 of 1,020
#77Wyandotte County, 20 320.10.1968% #77 of 1,020
#78Muskingum County, 39 1660.1960% #78 of 1,020
#79Cerro Gordo County, 19 840.1951% #79 of 1,020
#80Alamance County, 37 289.90.1946% #80 of 1,020
#81Barrow County, 13 172.70.1928% #81 of 1,020
#82Newton County, 29 139.40.1919% #82 of 1,020
#83Contra Costa County, 06 2,309.40.1910% #83 of 1,020
#84Manitowoc County, 55 156.60.1893% #84 of 1,020
#85Iredell County, 37 349.00.1884% #85 of 1,020
#86Marion County, 19 550.1861% #86 of 1,020
#87Putnam County, 12 1400.1829% #87 of 1,020
#88Burke County, 37 176.50.1825% #88 of 1,020
#89Davidson County, 47 1,294.00.1819% #89 of 1,020
#90Bedford County, 47 99.00.1816% #90 of 1,020
#91Milwaukee County, 55 1,675.30.1810% #91 of 1,020
#92Wilson County, 48 95.40.1801% #92 of 1,020
#93Northwest Hills Planning Region, 09 204.00.1799% #93 of 1,020
#94Finney County, 20 68.30.1798% #94 of 1,020
#95Worcester County, 25 1,5530.1785% #95 of 1,020
#96Warren County, 19 101.40.1775% #96 of 1,020
#97Dane County, 55 1,0160.1765% #97 of 1,020
#98Clay County, 19 300.1759% #98 of 1,020
#99Anoka County, 27 673.60.1736% #99 of 1,020
#100Kings County, 06 260.60.1720% #100 of 1,020

Make a connection that matters.

Introduce your organization to the people exploring this community. Sponsorship supports this publication and does not influence its rankings.

Sponsor this page